Brand-led masthead
A distinctive Life Support identity with simple navigation into subscriptions, devotionals, background, and contact.
Archive / editorial website / publishing
Life Support
09 / 11An archival devotional publishing website with a strong masthead, featured stories, a readable article feed, and a visible email-subscription path.
Original supplied website capture. Historical article and subscription details remain part of the archive.
THE BRIEF
What the project
needed to do.
Life Support brought recurring devotional writing into a branded publishing experience. The design needed to make the current featured piece visible while giving readers an easy way to find more writing and subscribe for future encouragement.
MY APPROACH
Connecting the design
with the work.
The captured design uses a recognizable heart-and-pulse masthead, a large featured-story area, an organized latest-devotionals feed, and a separate subscription column. Story imagery and clear article titles do most of the work, with the brand framing the reading experience.
Part of the design archive.
PROJECT SCOPE
The work in detail.
Featured-story presentation
A large lead image with the article title, excerpt, author, and visible continuation cues.
Editorial feed
Repeatable article rows combining imagery, titles, excerpts, and author metadata.
Email subscription
A prominent signup area placed alongside the content so returning readership has a clear next step.
THE EXPERIENCE
How the pieces connect.
- 01
Arrive
Recognize the brand and the featured devotional.
- 02
Read
Explore the latest writing through the article feed.
- 03
Return
Use the devotional navigation to continue browsing.
- 04
Subscribe
Choose to receive future encouragement by email.
01 / PROJECT DETAIL
A publishing design with a clear reading hierarchy.
The featured story establishes the first reading choice, while the article list gives the rest of the archive a consistent visual structure. The right column keeps email acquisition visible without replacing the main editorial content.
This case is based on the historical capture supplied for the portfolio. Subscriber figures, article dates, and engagement counts visible in that image are archival interface content, not current audience claims. The available evidence supports the design presentation, not a claim about the original backend or present-day site operation.
HAVE SOMETHING IN MIND?